Takaful (Arabic: التكافل‎, sometimes translated as “solidarity” or mutual guarantee)[1] is a co-operative system of reimbursement or repayment in case of loss, organized as an Islamic or sharia compliant alternative to conventional insurance, which Takaful proponents believe contains forbidden riba (usury) and gharar (excessive uncertainty).[2]

Under takaful, people and companies concerned about hazards make regular contributions (“donations”) to be reimbursed or repaid to members in the event of loss, and managed on their behalf by a takaful operator.[3] Like other Islamic finance products, Takaful is grounded in Islamic Muamalat (commercial and civil acts or dealings branch of Islamic law).

By the end of 2011, the takaful industry had grown to $12 billion “contributions” and has been forecast to reach $20 billion by 2017.[4]The total global Takaful contributions were estimated at US$14.9 billion in 2015, representing a double-digit growth rate of 14% in 2015.[5] The movement has been praised as providing “superior alternatives” to insurance that “reinvigorate human capital, emphasize personal dignity, community self-help, and economic self-development”;[6] but also criticized as having “dwindled” in scope to an industry of “conventional insurance with Arabic terminology and language of contract”.[7]


Theoretically, takaful is perceived as cooperative or mutual insurance, where members contribute a certain sum of money to a common pool. The purpose of this system is not profits, but to uphold the principle of “bear ye one another’s burden”. The principles of takaful are as follows:

  • Policyholders cooperate among themselves for their common good.[8]
  • Policyholders’ contributions are considered as donations to the fund (pool).[8]
  • Every policyholder pays his subscription to help those who need assistance.[8]
  • Losses are divided and liabilities spread according to the community pooling system.[8]
  • Uncertainty is eliminated concerning subscription and compensation.[8]
  • It does not derive advantage at the cost of others.[8]

Muslims scholar have “hardly any difference of opinion” on “the need for managing, redeeming and mitigating general, business and life risks covered by the insurance business”.[2]But whether conventional insurance is forbidden (haram) is disputed.

Fiqh scholars

In its second session (December 1985),[9] the Fiqh Academy of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (also called the International Islamic Fiqh Academy) ruled conventional commercial (but not social insurance) insurance haram (forbidden). Its ninth resolution stated:

The commercial insurance contract, with a fixed insurance premium, as practiced by commercial insurance companies, contains substantial gharar, which renders the contract defective. Consequently, it is legally forbidden.[10]

Argument against conventional insurance

Islamic scholars began forbidding commercial insurance as early as the late nineteenth century C.E.[11] Orthodox (i.e. most) Islamic scholars believe commercial insurance is disallowed for Muslims because it contains

  • Al-Gharar(uncertainty)
  • Al-Maisir(gambling)
  • Riba (usury)

They have two main concerns about conventional insurance:

  1. The uncertainty “if and when the insured event will take place and, if it does take place, what would be the relationship of compensation to the insurance premium paid”. (What if the holder of collision insurance policy never has a motor vehicle accident? they lose and the insurance company wins. Regarding life insurance, everyone dies, but what if the death occurs after the first payment of a premium for life insurance? they win and the insurance company loses.)[2]This “makes the insurance business similar to gambling, where the gambler does not know the fate of the game”. Thus, uncertainty in the conventional insurance business “is excessive and borders on prohibited gharar”.[2]
  2. “Insurance companies invest surplus funds on the basis of interest and pay out a part of such earnings to policyholders as bonuses.” According to the ‘orthodox interpretation’, this is riba.[2]

Defense of conventional insurance

A minority of Islamic scholars argue that insurance is not like gambling because in gambling, no risk is covered and no damage is mitigated. The gamblers play a game of chance for entertainment and profit in which they can win or lose, based on a conscious decision.[1][12] Insurance provides coverage for events out of the insured policyholder’s control. When the policyholder collects a payout, they are not a winner, but a loser who at least has some compensation.[12] Furthermore, while insurance involves uncertainty, “statistical techniques and actuarial sciences have progressed to a stage where the insurance company can calculate its risks and benefits with great precision,” so that the uncertainty involved in insurance can scarcely be called excessive in normal circumstances.[1]

Scriptural basis

Islamic scholars supporting takaful point to Qur’an [Quran 5:2] [Note 1] and several sayings (hadith) of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Some examples are:


Basis of Co-operation: Help one another in al-Birr and in al-Taqwa (both: virtue, righteousness and piety), but do not help one another in sin and transgression. (Sūrat al-Māʼidah, Verse 2)[Quran 5:2][15][citation needed]


  • God will always help his servant for as long as he helps others. (Narratives by Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal and Imam Abu Daud.)[citation needed]
  • Basis of Responsibility: The place of relationships and feelings of people with faith, between each other, is just like the body; when one of its parts is afflicted with pain, then the rest of the body will be affected. (Narratives by Imam al-Bukhari and Imam Muslim)[16]
  • One true Muslim (Mu’min) and another true Muslim are like a building, whereby every part in it strengthens the other part. (Narratives by Imam al-Bukhari and Imam Muslim)[17]
  • Basis of Mutual Protection: By my life (which is in God’s power), nobody will enter Paradise if he does not protect his neighbour who is in distress. (Narrative of Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal.)[18]

The fundamentals underlying takaful are very similar to co-operative and mutual principles, to the extent that the co-operative and mutual model is one that is accepted under Islamic law.[citation needed]

Takaful industry and models


The concept of takaful has reportedly been practised in various forms since 622 AD.[6] Muslim jurists acknowledge that the basis of shared responsibility (in the system of aquila as practised between the Muslims of Mecca and Medina) laid the foundation of mutual insurance.

“In the case of insurance, as with commercial banks, orthodox opinion prevailed,” and with “a consensus among Muslim scholars” about the legitimacy of takaful and the illegitimacy of conventional insurance, the “movement for Islamizing the contemporary insurance business” started around the mid-1970s. In 1976, a fatwa was issued by the Higher Council of Saudi Arabia “in favor of an Islamic model” of insurance.[6] The International Islamic Fiqh Academy, Jeddah of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation also approved takaful as a legitimate form of business in 1985.[19][1] The Islamic Insurance Company of Sudan started as the first takaful company in 1979.[20] By the mid 1990s, there were seven takaful companies in Sudan, Dubai, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Jordan.[21]

The industry grew from $1.384 billion in 2004 to $5.318 billion in 2008.[22] By the end of 2011, total takaful contributions amounted to $12 billion (as compared to $4 trillion for conventional insurance).[21] In 2005, there were 82 companies around the world engaged in takaful business (77 dedicated takaful companies, and five “offering takaful products” from “Islamic windows”).[21] By 2006, there were 133.[19] As with the traditional forms of insurance, reinsurance of a takaful operation may be used, known as “retakaful”.[23] Also in 2006, AIG, a non-Muslim US-based company (with more than 88 million customers in 130 countries), established a takaful subsidiary called AIG Takaful Enaya, headquartered in Bahrain.[24] As of 2013 the leading takaful countries are “Malaysia and the Gulf states”.[21] It was reported in 2016 that out of total 308 takaful companies, 93 are takaful windows; however, these takaful windows own only 2.5% of the total takaful assets.[25]


There are several models (and several variations) of how takaful can be implemented:

  • Mudharabahmodel (profit-sharing): the managers (shareholders) are sharing profit and losses with the policyhoders; used initially in Far East.
  • Tabarru’-based: “donations” (Tabarru’), i.e. premiums, are accumulated into a fund to meet members’ losses. Members are not allowed to take back any contributions or profits from investments.[26]
  • A combination of Tabarru’and Mudharabah: Bahrain, UAE and Middle East countries.
  • Wakalamodel: agency fee, received up front from the contributors and transferred to shareholders fund.
  • Al Waqf-based model: Waqf is a distinct entity and a legal person. According to one critic, “except for names and terms, the essence” of both Al Waqftakaful and conventional insurance is the same, and as a consequence this structure “has come under a lot of criticism from Shari’ah scholars”.[27] Mainly used in Pakistan and South Africa.[citation needed]

The Mudharabah model (profit-sharing)

According to this principle the al-Mudharib (takaful operator) accepts payment of the takaful installments or takaful contributions (premiums, known as ra’s-ul-mal) from investors or providers of capital or funds (takaful participants), acting as sahib-ul-mal. The contract specifies how the profits (or surplus) from the operations of the takaful is to be shared in accordance with the principle of al-mudharabah between the participants (as providers of capital) and the takaful operator. The sharing of such profit may be in a ratio of 50:50, 60:40, 70:30 and so forth, as mutually agreed between the contracting parties.[citation needed][28]

In order to eliminate the element of uncertainty in the takaful contract, the concept of tabarru’ (“to donate, contribute, or give away”) is incorporated. Relating to this concept, a participant agrees to relinquish (as tabarru’) a certain proportion of his takaful installments (or contributions) that he agrees or undertakes to pay, should any of his fellow participants suffer a defined loss. This agreement enables him to fulfill his obligation of mutual help and joint guarantee.[citation needed]

In essence, tabarru’ enables participants to perform their deeds in assisting fellow participants who might suffer a loss or damage due to a catastrophe or disaster. The sharing of profit (or surplus) that may emerge from the operations of a takaful is made only after the obligation of assisting the fellow participants has been fulfilled. It is imperative, therefore, for a takaful operator to maintain adequate assets of the defined funds under its care whilst striving prudently to ensure the funds are sufficiently protected against over-exposure. Therefore, the provision of insurance coverage is in conformity with Shariah based on the Islamic principles of al-takaful and al-mudharabah.[citation needed]

Al-mudharabah is the commercial profit-sharing contract between the provider or providers of funds for a business venture and the entrepreneur who actually conducts the business. The operation of a takaful may thus be envisaged as the profit-sharing business venture between the takaful operator and the individual members of a group of participants who desire to reciprocally guarantee each other against a certain loss or damage that may be inflicted upon any one of them.[citation needed]


One complaint made against (most) takaful (by Muhammad Akram Khan) is that despite the talk of solidarity, (most) takaful-holders “do not have any ‘voice'” in the management of the takaful. The “TO (takaful operator) makes all the crucial decisions, such as rate of premium, risk strategy, asset management and allocation of surpluses and profits”. The shareholders of the TO, and “not the takaful-holders, appoint and dismiss managers of the takaful”.[29] Similarly, Mahmud El-Gamal complains that “even companies that use the term takaful ta’āwun (cooperative mutual guarantee or insurance) are structured with stockholder rather than policyholder ownership”, despite the 9/2 ruling of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy that permitted insurance as “cooperative insurance, built on the principles of voluntary contribution (tabarru’) and mutual cooperation”.[30] An exception to this state of affairs can be found in Sudan, where the takaful-holders have more say in the management of the takaful business.[27]

Whether takaful is significantly different from conventional insurance has been questioned. Islamic economist Mohammad Najatuallah Siddiqui writes that

“The form of organization chosen to take advantage of the law of large numbers does not change the reality. We can make insurance a not-for-profit activity (provided we can ensure efficient management), but it does not change the essential nature of what is being done.”[31]

According to Rakaan Kayali, the fact that benefits for the takaful members are distributed as funds allow, rather than defined by the policy, may lead to conflict among members — if, for example, one member’s claim uses up takaful funds so that another member with an equally valid claim a short time later is not compensated, or not compensated in full.[32][self-published source]

Additionally, there has been doubt cast on the legitimacy of claiming that takaful participants are making “donations”. This is because the word “donations” implies giving with no expectation of worldly return. This is clearly not the case with takaful participants who are seeking insurance.[32][self-published source]


  1. ^ISLAMIC INSURANCE THEORY and PRACTICE states: `All legal evidence permits Cooperative Insurance, as God says in the Holy Quran, “Cooperate for good and pious deeds and do not cooperate to do evil and aggression.”`[13] But does not specifically cite [Quran 5:2]. Shakir translates part of [Quran 5:2] as “and help one another in goodness and piety, and do not help one another in sin and aggression;”[14]
  2. ^ Jump up to:ab c d Khan, What Is Wrong with Islamic Economics?, 2013: p.403
  3. ^ Jump up to:ab c d e Khan, What Is Wrong with Islamic Economics?, 2013: p.402
  4. ^Ajmal Bhatty, President & Chief Executive Officer, Tokio Marine Middle East, Takaful Summit 2011.
  5. ^“Global Takaful premium to reach $20 billion by 2017”. Gulf News Banking. April 13, 2015. Retrieved 10 August 2016.
  6. ^“Takaful 2017 Full Report” (PDF).
  7. ^ Jump up to:ab c Omar Fisher and Dawood Y.Taylor (April 2000). “Prospects for Evolution of Takaful in the 21st Century: Origins of Takaful”. President and Fellows of Harvard College.
  8. ^Khan, What Is Wrong with Islamic Economics?, 2013: p.410
  9. ^ Jump up to:ab c d e f “About Takaful Insurance”. takaful.coop. International Cooperative and Mutual Insurance Federation. Archived from the original on 13 October 2016. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  11. ^El-Gamal, Islamic Finance, 2006: p.147
  12. ^el-Gamal, Mahmoud A. (2006). Islamic Finance : Law, Economics, and Practice (PDF). New York, NY: Cambridge. p. 61. ISBN 9780521864145.
  13. ^ Jump up to:ab Jamaldeen, Islamic Finance For Dummies, 2012: p.295
  14. ^Mulhim, Ahmed Salem; Sabbagh, Ahmed Mohammed (c. 2001). The ISLAMIC INSURANCE THEORY and PRACTICE (PDF). Retrieved 9 August 2016.
  15. ^“Verse (5:2) – English Translation”. corpus.quran.com. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  16. ^“Proof for the concept of Takaful in Quran and Sunnah” (PDF). takaful.com. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  17. ^Ariff,, Mohamed; Iqbal, Munawar, eds. (2011). The Foundations of Islamic Banking: Theory, Practice and Education. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 190. Retrieved 7 September2017.
  18. ^“Daily Hadith Online”. abuaminaelias.com. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  19. ^Alam,, Nafis; Rizvi, Syed Aun R., eds. (2017). Islamic Economies: Stability, Markets and Endowments. Springer. p. 15. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  20. ^ Jump up to:ab Ernst & Young, World Takaful Report 2008
  21. ^Jamaldeen, Faleel. “Key Sharia Principles and Prohibitions in Islamic Finance”. Retrieved 24 July 2016.
  22. ^ Jump up to:ab c d Khan, What Is Wrong with Islamic Economics?, 2013: p.408
  23. ^Ernst & Young, World Takaful Report 2010
  24. ^“Concept Paper – Guidelines on Takaful Operational Framework” (PDF). Bank Negara Malaysia. 2009-12-01.
  25. ^Jamaldeen, Islamic Finance For Dummies, 2012: p.302
  26. ^“WORLD TAKAFUL REPORT 2016” (PDF). 2016.
  27. ^Khan, What Is Wrong with Islamic Economics?, 2013: p.405
  28. ^ Jump up to:ab Archer, Simon; Abdel Karim, Riffat Ahmed; Nienhaus, Volker (2009). Takaful Islamic insurance: Concepts and regulatory issues. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons (Asia). pp. 63–4.
  29. ^Mahbubi Ali, Mohammad. “TAKAFUL MODELS: THEIR EVOLUTION AND FUTURE DIRECTION”. icr journal. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  30. ^Khan, What Is Wrong with Islamic Economics?, 2013: p.409
  31. ^El-Gamal, Islamic Finance, 2006: p.170
  32. ^Siddiqui, Mohammad Najatuallah “Islamic banking and finance in theory and practice: A survey of the state of the art.” Islamic Economic Studies, 13 (2) (February): 1-48
  33. ^ Jump up to:ab Kayali, Rakaan. “The True Difference Between Takaful and Insurance”. Practical Islamic Finance. wordpress.

Ofer Abarbanel online library

Ofer Abarbanel online library

Ofer Abarbanel online library